Mention the words “church” and “counseling” in the same sentence and I assure you the response will be surprising. While the Church has been a place people have turned to during emotional struggles for centuries, the development of modern psychology has sparked an intense debate within the Church. What causes mental illness or emotional struggles? What is the best way to address those issues? Should a pastor provide counseling or is that the job of a professionally licensed therapist? Does embracing certain aspects of psychological study mean we are compromising our faith?
Many have jumped to conclusions about the Church Therapy model, asserting that I have somehow sold out on my faith because I have studied psychology and advocate for professional licensure. Previously on Twitter, a person I do not know who has never asked a single question about this model wrote to me: “Counseling minus Christ equals deception.” Whoa. I have learned not to take these comments personally, but it did get me thinking about how to articulate my views on the role of Christ in counseling. First of all, I want to clarify that the Church Therapy model is primarily focused on counseling those who are already following Christ. Of course there may be some who are in a seeker-phase of the spiritual journey, but typically those who come to a church for counseling are already Christians. I do not believe it is the role of a counselor to proselytize in a counseling session, so for this reason Church Therapy does not seek to gain new converts.
Counseling in the Church Therapy model is part of the discipleship process as spiritual growth and emotional health provide increased freedom. Christ is 100% at the center of this process because he alone is able to supernaturally change lives. However, that does not mean that my primary methods are quoting Scripture or praying with clients. At times these can be helpful, but more often psychological strategies such as Motivational Interviewing or Cognitive Behavioral Therapy are far more effective in helping a person overcome various emotional challenges. For this reason, training in the Bible is not enough to train a person to be an effective counselor. Even basic helping skills like active listening, though useful on some level, are not enough to train a person to be a competent counselor.
So how can it be that I claim Christ is at the center yet I highlight modern psychological techniques as superior methods for therapy? Perhaps an illustration would help clarify this point. A couple of years ago, I walked alongside some friends whose baby had lost oxygen for nearly 15 minutes at birth. He was rushed into the NICU and placed on a cooling pad, an advanced treatment for babies at risk for brain damage at birth. The baby had to be on the cooling pad for 72 hours before any testing could be done to assess brain damage. During this time the goal was to slow the development of brain cells in order to stop any further damage. That was the longest 72 hours I have ever experienced as we prayed and fasted and poured everything we had into seeking a miracle for this baby (who the doctor’s warned would probably be very brain damaged). Every day that I see that little boy, who has little to no signs of brain damage today, I see a walking miracle. Was Christ at the center of his healing? Absolutely. Did the doctors use a modern method to facilitate that process? Yes.
Using researched strategies to address mental health issues is no different. We no longer have to accept the ideologies of Freud, Jung or Skinner in order to believe that modern psychology has a lot of knowledge to offer. Even most secular counselors do not hold tightly to these early definitions of psychology. The Church Therapy model connects biblical, psychological and biological truths in order to most effectively move a person towards healing and life change as they deepen in their walk with Christ.
Unfortunately, even many Christian counselors do not view counseling as part of the discipleship process and they counsel many non-believers. They can help them change certain aspects of their life, help them cope, or improve their communication skills. But this does not move them into deeper relationship with Jesus. The Church Therapy model is a true integration of Christian faith and psychological study. Both are in mind at all times as the Holy Spirit moves in the midst of effective therapeutic strategies.
This is the most concise and articulate posit I have ever read by you regarding this topic. You are absolutely right on with the utilization of technique and processes, being that they are objective. The problem that always exists in the “Integrationalist” tradition is when those objective tools and techniques are undergirded by humanist philosiphies and intermingled with fundamental godly perspective. You have developed an ideal approach. .The practitioner must be trained in the techniques of counseling to be effective and also have a clear biblical understanding being able to decipher between God’s mindset from man’s mindset. You do that very well.Keep up the important work you do “good and faithful servant”
Kristen, I cannot fathom how anyone (although realistically every innovative technique in any field will have its critics) could find fault with the Church Therapy model. The connection between emotional-physical-spiritual is the trinity of our bodies and minds.
I just gave the testimony of my experience with three personal bouts with depression between 1991 and 2015. I gave the illustration that I could not have recovered each time without holding to the hand of Jesus Christ; yet, I had to have first-class doctors and counseling who knew how to treat clinical depression with medication and therapy.
You are ahead of your time in what you do. God bless you!
Thanks for the encouragement Steve!